Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Tsung-Hao Huang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L W W L L
Form
W L L W W W W W W LHead-2-Head: Wong 2 - 1 Huang
They have played 8 sets in total, with Wong winning 5 and Huang winning 3. The last match between Wong and Huang was at the Shenzhen 2 Challenger, 20-10-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 2 |
| Tsung-Hao Huang | 1 |
Shenzhen 2 Challenger(20-10-2023)
4
6
7
5
6
3
| Wong | Stats | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (10-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 169 | Ranking | 702 |
| 128 | Highest Rank | 521 |
| 20 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 2 |
| 56% (139-110) | Career Total W/L | 53% (166-145) |
| $225,210 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Etcheverry VS Musetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
41%
(
40 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
123)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
123)
115
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(2) 10-6 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 46 | Games Won | 41 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:9:0 | Average Match Time | 1:9:0 |
| 51% (73/143) | 1st Serve % | 60% (119/197) |
| 82% (60/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (68/119) |
| 51% (36/70) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (40/78) |
| 38% (9/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 45% (89/197) | Return Points Win % | 33% (47/143) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tsung-Hao Huang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
31 of
40)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Yuto Oki
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Renta Tokuda
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Sora Fukuda
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Yuichiro Inui
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yua Taka
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
69 of
125)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
23%
(
10 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
61 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
69 of
125)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Kohei Hayashi
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (139/110) | Win/Loss | 53% (166/145) |
| 54% (311/269) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (371/343) |
| 51% (2855/2734) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3254/3245) |
| 59% (115/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (155/125) |
| 50% (18/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (10/15) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1315 | Aces Total | 488 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 502 | Total Double Faults | 487 |
| 1:30:16 | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 379.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 423.25 |
| 60% (9202/15310) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10698/17195) |
| 71% (6508/9202) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6685/10698) |
| 48% (2957/6108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3140/6497) |
| 40% (583/1449) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (851/1803) |
| 39% (5978/15446) | Return Points Win % | 42% (7214/17074) |
| 33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (53/44) | Challenger W/L | 32% (6/13) |
| 60% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 55% (160/130) |
| 55% (134/244) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (162/307) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (45/82) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (32/54) |
| 57% (46/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (53/96) |
| 88% (129/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (165/142) |
| 12% (129/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (165/23) |
| 21% (120/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (146/23) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
